Nielson v. Thompson
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Justice.
Janice and Lenus Nielson (the Nielsons) assert that the district court erred in limiting their participation in the property settlement negotiations between Russell J. Thompson and Karen E. Thompson (the Thompsons) in the Thompsons’ divorce proceeding. The Nielsons are judgment creditors of Russell J. Thompson, and the district court permitted them to intervene in the divorce case. Thereafter, the district court entered its Amended Order Re Intervention, in which the district court ruled that, “Nielsons should not be a party to settlement negotiations, but should be afforded…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- United States v. City of New BritainSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- In Re the Marriage of BrownMontana Supreme Court · 1978
- Dobbins v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1971
- Collins v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
- George F. Collins, Jr. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In Re Marriage of GonzalezUtah Supreme Court · 2000
- Crowson v. Zubrod (In Re Crowson)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Guy Morrison, Iii v. Tami Hinson-MorrisonWyoming Supreme Court · 2024
- William Waterbury v. Brenda Waterbury, N/K/A Brenda FrelsiWyoming Supreme Court · 2017
- Olsen v. OlsenWyoming Supreme Court · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.