Legal Opinion
Miskovsky v. Tulsa Tribune Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 21, 1983No. 55430PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LAVENDER, Justice.
For the purposes of this appeal, we need only consider the sufficiency of the allegations set forth in the amended petition to withstand a demurrer, the amended petition being identical to the original petition, except that the amended petition contains general allegations of special damages.
The amended petition alleges that defendants below are engaged in printing, publishing, and circulation of a newspaper known as The Tulsa Tribune of general circulation in Creek County, State of Oklahoma. Plaintiff below is a resident of Oklahoma City, a graduate of the University of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Martin v. Griffin Television, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
- Kee v. Armstrong, Byrd & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Miskovsky v. Oklahoma Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Fite v. Oklahoma Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Peterson v. GrishamCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Gaylord Entertainment Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- Brock v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- Sellers v. Oklahoma Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Kleier Advertising, Inc. v. Premier Pontiac, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.