Legal Opinion

Bosell v. Rannestad

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 18, 1948No. 34,652PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Knutson, Justice.

Plaintiff appeals from an order denying her motion for a new trial after a verdict for defendant.

Plaintiff seeks to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained as a result of a collision between an automobile in which she was riding as a passenger and one driven by defendant. The collision occurred at the intersection of Monroe street and Twenty-seventh avenue northeast in the city of Minneapolis.

Twenty-seventh avenue runs in an easterly and westerly direction. To the south of Twenty-seventh avenue, Monroe street runs in a southerly direction. It does not run…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Joy v. St. LouisSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Mattfeld v. NesterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  3. Moore v. KujathSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  4. City of St. Paul v. ColterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1866
  5. Merritt v. StuveSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Kolatz v. KellySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  2. Lovey v. Escambia CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
  3. Demmer v. GrunkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  4. Peterson v. LangSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  5. State Ex Rel. Department of Natural Resources v. HessSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API