Legal Opinion

State v. Phillips

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 26, 1989No. 139PA88PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Justice.

The Court of Appeals did not hold that a victim impact statement may not be used at a sentencing hearing. Relying on the confrontation clause of the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution and the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution as well as the law of the land clause of Article I, Sec. 19 of the Constitution of North Carolina, the Court of Appeals held that a defendant must be given prior notice of any victim impact statement which is to be used at a sentencing hearing.

N.C.G.S. § 15A-825 provides for the use of victim…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Booth v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  5. State v. PopeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. HurtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  2. State v. SingsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  3. State v. QuickCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  4. State v. RiceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API