Legal Opinion
Sipple v. City of Hayward
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 8, 2014No. B242893PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BOREN, P. J.
For a number of years, individuals throughout California were improperly charged taxes for Internet access by their Internet service provider, New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC (New Cingular), prompting various customers to file putative class action lawsuits. The lawsuits eventually settled, with New Cingular agreeing to seek refunds of the taxes from the cities and counties to which the taxes were remitted. After refund claims were denied, New Cingular (and various individual plaintiffs purporting to act on behalf of other customers) brought this action against the cities and…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- City of San Jose v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Californians for Disability Rights v. Mervyn's, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Smith v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- CALIFORNIANS FOR DISAB. RIGHTS v. Mervyn'sCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Reid v. City of San Diego, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- McClain v. Sav-On DrugsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Limon v. Circle K StoresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
- McClain v. Sav-On DrugsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Reid v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.