Legal Opinion
Doe v. United States Postal Service
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided February 7, 2003No. 01-5395PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge TATEL.
TATEL, Circuit Judge:
An HIV-positive postal worker who first revealed his medical condition to Postal Service officials as part of a request for leave pursuant to the Family and Medical Leave Act alleges that one of those officials disclosed his HIV status to his coworkers in violation of both the Privacy Act and the Rehabilitation Act. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the Postal Service on both claims. Because we conclude that appellant has raised a genuine issue of material fact as to whether Postal Service officials…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. AikensSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Etim U. Aka v. Washington Hospital CenterCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- Cleveland v. Policy Management Systems Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Richard C. Bartel v. Federal Aviation Administration Richard C. Bartel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Regan-Touhy v. Walgreen Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Franklin v. PotterDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Lee v. City of Columbus, OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- Fred Taylor v. City of ShreveportCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
- Cassandra Menoken v. Janet DhillonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2020
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.