Legal Opinion

Dominic v. Faucett

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1929No. Docket No. 157 Calendar No. 33,960PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

In this workmen’s compensation case, where an award to plaintiff is reviewed on certiorari, the question is whether plaintiff was an employee or an independent contractor.

Plaintiff and another man were shown by defendant Faucett a strip of land, sufficiently described, from which they were to cut and to swamp all merchantable logs, at a certain price per log. Plaintiff was to pay a dollar a day for his board at defendant’s camp, and he was to pay for the use of tools furnished him by defendant. Plaintiff and his companion accepted the work. Plaintiff was injured when he had worked nearly two…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tuttle v. Embury-Martin Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Opitz v. HoertzMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Warner v. Fullerton-Powell Hardwood Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Nelson v. StukeyMontana Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Wise v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Niemann v. Iowa Electric Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1934
  4. Begovac v. Northwestern Cooperage & Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Stevenson v. Antrim Iron Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API