Legal Opinion

Street v. . Tuck

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 5, 1881PublishedCited by 17 opinions

. Civil Action tried upon complaint'and demurrer at Fall Term, 1880, of Person Superior Court, before Eure, J. Demurrer overruled and defendants appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, C. J.

The complaint alleges that John and Nathaniel Baird, executors of William Baird, to whom they were indebted at the time of his decease, executed their note to G. D. Satterfield, executor of S. M. Dickens, who was a creditor of their testator, in payment of the debt and charged the estate of the said William with the amount thereof. This note was afterwards transferred to the next of kin of said Dickens and purchased from them at a nominal price by the defendant, N. N. Tuck, clerk of the superior court, with the fraudulent intent of collecting the same out of the estate of said William Baird.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Logan v. . WallisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877
  2. State Ex Rel. Harris v. HarrisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
  3. Alexander v. . WolfeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Solomon v. . BatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  2. Bryan v. SullivanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Hodges v. Wilmington & Weldon RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  4. Martin v. . GoodeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
  5. State Ex Rel. Cromartie v. ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API