Legal Opinion

Souders v. Carolina Portland Cement Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 25, 1907No. 570PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Complaint, from city court of Atlanta — Judge Beid: May 18, 1907.

1Opinion of the CourtPowell, J.

Rule 11 of the Superior Court (Civil Code, 1895, §5642) provides: “In actions of assumpsit' for the recovery of •unliquidated demands, a bill of particulars shall be annexed to the copy served on the defendant; and in every ease where the plea of set-off snail be filed, a copy of the set-off shall be filed at the time of filing the answer; and when the bill of particulars is not annexed to the declaration, the plaintiff shall lose a term; and if service of said bill of particulars is not effected upon the defendant by the succeeding term, a nonsuit shall be awarded.” The term “nonsuit,” as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kelly v. Strouse & Bros.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Ward v. Stewart & WardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  3. Taylor v. ChambersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pacific Selling Co. v. Albright-Prior Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  2. Red Line Products Co. v. J. M. High Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  3. Richardson v. Empire Talc & Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API