Legal Opinion

Haymes v. McDermott

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 19, 1927No. 17124PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHefner, J.

This was an action by Jesse McDermott to recover an undivided one-half interest in a certain tract of land and to have the land partitioned and to adjudicate the heirship of Willie Thompson, deceased . allottee.

Plaintiff was a full-blood Creek Indian, and the action is based on the Act of Congress of June 14, 1918, for the partition of land. He claimed that he was one of the heirs of th'e original allottee and owned a one-half interest in said land, and was therefore entitled to have the same partitioned.

The defendants d'enied that plaintiff was an heir of the original allottee, and the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kountz v. DavisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1879

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. National Exploration Co. v. RobinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  2. Gilchrist v. SuttonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  3. Boepple v. EstillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. United States v. HellardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1943
  5. Welch v. PatrickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API