Legal Opinion
State v. Rizor
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided June 3, 2004No. Nos. 22123-7-III; 22124-5-III; 22125-3-III; 22126-1-III; 22127-0-III; 22128-8-III; 22129-6-III; 22130-0-III; 22131-8-III; 22137-7-IIIPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKato, C.J.
The State charged the respondents here with escape from community custody under RCW 72.09.310. Claiming they were not inmates under the statute, each moved to dismiss. The court reasoned that, because the respondents served their time at county jails, they were not in the custody of the Department of Corree-*900tions (DOC) and thus were not inmates under RCW 72.09.310. The State appeals. We reverse.
These respondents were convicted of felonies after July 1, 2000. Each was sentenced to a term of less than one year to be served at the Yakima County Jail and to one year of community custody under…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. TheilkenWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- City of Bellevue v. East Bellevue Community CouncilWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- City of Bellevue v. Community CouncilWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. LawCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Westway Construction, Inc. v. Benton CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- State v. RizorCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- Westway Const., Inc. v. Benton CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007