Legal Opinion

Pierce v. NAT BANK OF DETROIT

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 19, 1994No. Docket 157656PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant First of America (foa) seeks reversal of a June 27, 1991, order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board, which affirmed a hearing referee’s decision granting plaintiff a closed award of benefits only, but ordered foa to pay for her reasonable medical expenses until further order.

Plaintiff began working for defendant National Bank of Detroit (nbd) in November 1975 as a cash and service teller. She testified that she began experiencing pain in her right hand some time in 1981. After consulting with her family physician, plaintiff was referred to an orthopedic surgeon. The surgeon…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McDonald v. MEIJER, INCMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Wiltse v. Borden's Farm Products Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1950

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McLendon v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2007
  2. Pierce v. NAT BANK OF DETROITMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API