Legal Opinion

United States v. Joyner

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided July 16, 2026No. Criminal No. 2023-0309Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : : v. : Criminal Action No.: 23-309 (RC) : SHAMELL NAQUAN JOYNER, : Re Document No.: 150 : Defendant. : MEMORANDUM OPINION DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO EXCLUDE UNAUTHENTICATED PHOTOGRAPHS I. INTRODUCTION Just before a jury trial began in his case, Defendant Shamell Naquan Joyner moved to exclude the Government from offering six still images at trial—namely, Government Exhibits 202 through 205 and 211 through 212 (the “Speedway Screenshots”)—that were purportedly taken from a surveillance video at the Speedway…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. Ruben Ortiz, A/K/A Ruben Ortiz De Jesus, United States of America v. Felix Nunez, A/K/A Felix Nunez MolinaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
  2. United States v. Witold PlutaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  3. United States v. SafavianDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
  4. United States v. BlanchardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
  5. United States v. Caleb Gray-BurrissCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API