Legal Opinion
Hunter v. Gates
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 17, 2003No. 02-55427; D.C. No. CV-99-12811-GAFPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM *
D’N Hunter appeals the district court’s dismissal, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983, RICO, and coram nobis claims against Los Angeles officials. He also appeals the dis*71trict court’s decision to grant absolute prosecutorial immunity from civil RICO claims to former District Attorney Gilbert Garcetti. Reviewing de novo, we affirm the district court’s dismissal. We recount the facts only as necessary to explain our result.
1. A § 1988 claim accrues when a plaintiff knows or has reason to know of the injury upon which his claim is based. Cabrera…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hensley v. Municipal Court, San Jose-Milpitas Judicial Dist., Santa Clara Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Rotella v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Cabrera v. City of Huntington ParkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Grimmett v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Pincay v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Allen v. Similasan Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 2015
- Douglas v. ThompsonDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2024
- Yetter v. Ford Motor CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019