Johnson v. Berry
South Dakota Supreme Court
Appeal from Circuit Court, Clark County. Hon. JuuiAN BUN-NE'ri', Judge. Action by A. M. Johnson and another, doing business under the firm name of.Johnson & Johnson, against John Berry and another. From an order granting a new trial after verdict for plaintiffs, they appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtFuller, P. J.
Appellants prosecute this appeal from an order granting respondents a new trial in an action- based upon an inseparable threshing contract, the performance of which was unlawful, and expressly declared to be a misdemeanor, because in direct violation of section 3145 of the Revised Political Code, enacted as follows : “It shall be unlawful for any person to use a steam threshing machine in this state until he shall first enter into a bond with good and sufficient surety, in the sum of five hundred dollars, payable to the state; said bond to be approved by and filed with the clerk of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Armstrong v. TolerSupreme Court of the United States · 1826
- Penn v. BornmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
- Griffith v. WellsNew York Supreme Court · 1846
- Dillon v. AllenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1877
- Short v. Bullion-Beck & Champion Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1899
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Beverage Co. v. Villa Marie Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1944
- American Copying Co. v. Eureka BazaarSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1906
- Citizens' State Bank of Newton v. RoweSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
- Brown v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
- Conrad Seipp Brewing Co. v. GreenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.