Legal Opinion

State Ex Inf. North Todd Gentry v. Curtis

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 17, 1928PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAtwood, J.

This is a proceeding in quo warramto upon information of the Attorney-General to oust respondents as Supervisors of Webster Groves General Sewer District Number One of St. Louis County, Missouri, on the ground that the act under which respondents hold office is unconstitutional. Respondents waived the issuance and service of the order to show cause herein, entered their appearance and filed return. Relator demurred to this return on the ground that it did not “state facts sufficient to constitute any defense to relator’s cause of action,” and the cause was submitted on briefs without oral…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Houck v. Little River Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Wilson v. Board of TrusteesIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  3. State Ex Rel. Westhues v. SullivanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1920
  4. Harward v. St. Clair & Monroe Levee & Drainage Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1869
  5. Daggs v. Orient InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Barnes v. Lehi CityUtah Supreme Court · 1929
  2. State Ex Rel. Fire Dist. of Lemay v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1945
  3. State Ex Rel. Rouveyrol v. DonnellySupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  4. State Ex Rel. City of Hannibal v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1934
  5. State Ex Rel. Jackson County v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API