Maddox Coffee Co. v. Collins
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtHooper, J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) There are various forms of actions which may be brought to recover for injuries sustained by reason of the sale of unwholesome or deleterious food products, and this petition must, if possible, be given that construction which will sustain the suit. See Benjamin-Ozburn Co. v. Morrow, 13 Ga. App. 636 (79 S. E. 753). We arrive at the nature of this action by process of elimination. It iks not an action identical with those actions against a restaurant or café, as illustrated by Roe v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co., 29 Ga. App. 151 (113 S. E. 823),…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mayor of Macon v. DykesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Fleetwood v. Swift & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
- McPherson v. Capuano & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Martin v. McAfee & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
- Rowe v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Milton Bradley Co. of Ga. v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
- Stapleton v. AmersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
- Donaldson v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1938
- Albany Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. ShiverCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
- Davis v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.