Legal Opinion

Allin v. Georgas

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided February 25, 1936Published

1Opinion of the CourtBriggs, J.

This is an action of contract in which the plaintiff seeks to recover five hundred and seventy-five dollars for services rendered to the defendant. The defendant was defaulted. The date of the writ was September 23, 1933. On September 26, 1933 the writ was served on the Wellesley Fruit Company, named as trustee — which company answered that it had no goods, effects or credits the property of the defendant at the time of the service of the plaintiff’s writ.

The trustee filed a motion to be discharged and a hearing was had on that motion. At this hearing it was agreed that prior to the bringing…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co. v. BigelowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  2. Weiner v. D. A. Schulte, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  3. Goldman v. Noxon Chemical Products Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  4. Stearns v. StearnsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1819
  5. Miller v. County Commissioners of BarnstableMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API