Legal Opinion

In Re Trust of Rosenberg

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 2005No. S-03-563, S-03-612PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCormack, J.

NATURE OF CASE

These consolidated cases present issues related to the administration of the Monroe D. Rosenberg Trust Agreement. We conclude that we do not have jurisdiction over one of the issues presented on appeal. We further conclude that the county court’s failure to hold an evidentiary hearing requires us to vacate, and remand for such a hearing.

BACKGROUND

In 1984, Monroe D. Rosenberg executed the primary instruments of his estate plan: a last will and testament and a trust agreement. Monroe’s will made no provision for his wife or his three children from a prior marriage: Marilyn J.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Nebraska Nutrients, Inc. v. ShepherdNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Webb v. American Employers GroupNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Nebraska, Inc. v. DaileyNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
  4. In Re Estate of SnoverNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  5. In Re Estate of SeidlerNebraska Supreme Court · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In Re Trust of RosenbergNebraska Supreme Court · 2007
  2. In Re Guardianship of Sophia M.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2006
  3. In Re Guardianship of LarsonNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Steven S. v. Mary S.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Estate of MansfieldNebraska Supreme Court · 2007

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API