Legal Opinion
In Re Hance
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 18, 1993No. Bankruptcy 5-91-00245PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
JOHN J. THOMAS, Bankruptcy Judge.
Before the Court is a Motion entitled “Motion for Determination of Secured Status”. This Motion, however, requests the Court to require Sears, Roebuck & Co., (hereinafter “Sears”), “to prove any claim which it may assert against the property of Debtor, all of which has been claimed as exempt and, upon failure thereof, to deny such claim under the provision of Section 502(b)(1); and for such other and further relief as is just”. Consequently, this Court is treating the instant Motion as an objection to a Proof of Claim.
Before proceeding…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In the Matter of Bollinger Corporation, Bankrupt. Appeal of Carl L. Bigler, Trustee for Bollinger CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- In Re HardageUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 1989
3Cited by8 opinions
- In Re BuchholzUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. ConryAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
- Oszajca v. Sears (In Re Oszajca)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont · 1996
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Pugliese (In Re Pugliese)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
- In Re BeckUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. New York · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.