Legal Opinion
Tsibikas v. Morrof
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided February 13, 1951PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
12 N.J. Super. 102 (1951)
79 A.2d 64
ASTOR TSIBIKAS, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
MAXIMILIAN MORROF, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Reargued January 15, 1951.
Decided February 13, 1951.
Before Judges JACOBS, EASTWOOD and BIGELOW.
Mr. Harry Kay argued the cause for the appellant.
Mr. Emil W.A. Schumann argued the cause for the respondent (Mr. Firovanti O. Miniutti, on the brief).
The opinion of the court was delivered PER CURIAM.
The defendant Maximilian Morrof, an attorney-at-law of the State of New Jersey, appeals from a judgment entered in the Hudson County Court in…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. ModicaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- Roberts v. JamesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1912
- Bosze v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1948
- Waters v. Kings County Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Wolcott, Johnson & Co. v. MountSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1873
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hancock v. CrouchMissouri Court of Appeals · 1954
- Farber v. Shell Oil Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
- Adams v. NJ State FairNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
- NJ CABINET & MILL CO. INC. v. CreedonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
- Monarch Federal Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. GenserNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977