Legal Opinion

Abbott v. Norman

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 17, 1918PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Clark Circnit Court; Geo. R. Eaynie. Judge; 1. Appellee is liable under paragraph one for his failure to serve the writ. He was duly elected and qualified as constable and acted as such. 89 Ark. 488; 123 Id. 46. The law presumes that every officer has performed every duty enjoined on him by statute. A violation of that duty renders him liable. Kirby’s Dig. § 678; 23 iArk- 295. 2. The court erred in not rendering judgment for the penalties sued for.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Clark Circnit Court; Geo. R. Eaynie. Judge; 1. Appellee is liable under paragraph one for his failure to serve the writ. He was duly elected and qualified as constable and acted as such. 89 Ark. 488; 123 Id. 46. The law presumes that every officer has performed every duty enjoined on him by statute. A violation of that duty renders him liable. Kirby’s Dig. § 678; 23 iArk- 295. 2. The court erred in not rendering judgment for the penalties sued for. Kirby’s Dig., § § 4487, 4566, 4570, 355. He totally failed to serve the writ or return it. 3. The verdict, of the jury and judgment…

1Opinion of the Court

HART, J.,

(after stating the facts). The court

erred in reading section 678 of Kirby’s Digest to the jury and in instructing it that the right of the plaintiff to recover in the action depended upon whether or not the jury should find from a preponderance of the evidence that the bond provided for by section 678 of Kirby’s Digest had been given by Norman. It was shown by the two justices of peace of Missouri township that Norman was elected as constable of said township at the general election held in September, 1914. He told them that he had been sworn in as such constable. ,At any rate he…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pierce v. EdingtonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1881
  2. Town of Weston v. SpragueSupreme Court of Vermont · 1882
  3. Youngblood v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1882
  4. Carter v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1884

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rich and Hahn v. Graybar Elec. Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1935
  2. State v. BryantSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  3. Samper v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Samper v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Supreme Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API