Snow v. Socony Vacuum Oil Co.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By THE COURT:
The evidence is not sufficient to prove that the defendant had notice of a general plan of improvement of the allotment which was to be imposed on all purchasers of lots in the allotment in the absence of any reference to restrictions on the recorded plat of the allotment, and in the absence of any covenant in any allotment deed, that the sales of lots in the allotment would be made subject to like restrictions and that the restrictions were made for the benefit of all the lot owners in the allotment.
Kiley v Hall, 96 Oh St 374
Hayslett v Shell Petroleum Corp., 38 Oh Ap 164.
L…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Carranor Woods Property Owners' Ass'n v. DriscollOhio Court of Appeals · 1957
- Semachko v. HopkoOhio Court of Appeals · 1973
- Grant v. Hickok Oil Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1948
- Mahrt v. First Church of ChristMontgomery County Court of Common Pleas · 1955
- Copelin v. MorrisCuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1951