Legal Opinion

United States v. Steven Hammond

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 7, 2014No. 12-30337, 12-30339PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MURPHY, District Judge:

The government appeals the sentences of Steven and Dwight Hammond, whom a jury convicted of maliciously damaging the real property of the United States by fire, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 844(f)(1). The convictions carried minimum sentences of five years of imprisonment, but citing Eighth Amendment concerns, the district court sentenced Steven to only twelve months and one day of imprisonment and Dwight to only three months of imprisonment. Because the sentences were illegal and the government did not waive its right to appeal them, we vacate the sentences and…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Lockyer v. AndradeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Graham v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. Rummel v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States v. Duane EhmerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
  2. United States v. William KlenschCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
  3. Amin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. United States v. MilesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
  5. Amin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API