Kansas Farmers' Mutual Fire Insurance v. Amick
Supreme Court of Kansas
Motion for Rehearing. The facts are sufficiently stated in Insurance Go. v. Amide, ante, pp. 74, et seq., and in the opinion, infra, filed at the session of the court in June, 1891.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
HoiítoN, C. J.:
We do not think that the general execution in this ease, or any of the proceedings under the execution, or under the receivership, can compel or result in any assessment upon the premium notes of the first class to pay the losses or expenses of the second class; nor can any of the premiums notes executed by persons insured in the first class be sold, applied, or used in any way to pay the losses or expenses on the judgment upon the policy in this case, which belongs to the second class; nor can the collections or assets from the premium…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cited by4 opinions
- Nevins v. NevinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
- Feess v. Mechanics' State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
- Kansas Farmers' Mutual Fire Insurance v. AmickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1892
- Naill v. Kansas Farmers' Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891