Hartford Fire Insurance v. Harris Co. of Fort Smith, Inc.

OPINION AND ORDER

TIMOTHY L. BROOKS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Currently before the Court are The Harris Company of Forth Smith’s (“Harris”) Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 61), Ark-Con Testing Service’s (“Ark-Con”) Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 64), Limestone Development’s (“Limestone”) Motion to Set Aside Default (Doc. 68), and the various briefs accompanying and responding to those motions. For the reasons discussed below, these motions will be adjudicated as follows:

• Limestone’s Motion to Set Aside Default (Doc. 68) is GRANTED. Limestone is ORDERED to respond to Harris’s…