Legal Opinion

Maximum Home Health Care, Inc. v. Shalala

District Court, M.D. Tennessee

Decided July 27, 2000No. 3:99-0299Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

HAYNES, District Judge.

Plaintiff, Maximum Health Care, Inc, (Maximum) filed this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1395oo(f)(1), Title XVIII of the Social Security Act (the “Act”), 42 U.S.C. § 1395 et seq. that establishes Medicare, the federally funded health insurance program. Maximum seeks judicial review of the decision of the Administrator of the Health Care Financing Administration (HFCA) rendered on behalf of the defendant, Donna Shalala, in her official capacity as the Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services (Secretary). The gravamen of Maximum’s claim…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API