Legal Opinion

Reed v. Tucker

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 24, 1992No. 1910296PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KENNEDY, Justice.

The defendant appeals from the denial of his motion for a new trial. The issue is whether a prospective juror’s failure to accurately answer questions on voir dire resulted in probable prejudice to the defendant.

*841On May 24, 1990, 18-year-old Scotty L. Tucker graduated from high school. At a graduation party that night, the defendant, 30-year-old Gary Mitchell Reed, Jr., hit Tucker in the face. Tucker’s nose was broken in three places and required surgery. Tucker and Reed are first cousins, and both had been drinking when the incident occurred. Tucker sued Reed, alleging…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Freeman v. HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
  2. Bogle v. ScheerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  3. UNION MORTG. CO., INC. v. BarlowSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  4. Wallace by Inman v. CampbellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  5. Blackmon v. King Metals Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Shop-A-Snak Food Mart, Inc. v. PenhaleCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1997
  2. Radford v. StateCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1999
  3. Shop-A-Snak Food Mart, Inc. v. PenhaleCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API