Legal Opinion

People v. Murray

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 11, 1996No. 95SA303PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

A hearing panel of the supreme court grievance committee approved the findings and recommendation of a hearing board that the respondent be publicly censured, that he make certain restitution, and be assessed the costs of the proceeding. The assistant disciplinary counsel has excepted to the panel’s recommendation as too lenient, and the respondent has not filed an answer brief. We agree with the assistant disciplinary counsel that the respondent’s misconduct warrants a period of suspension. We therefore order that the respondent be suspended from the practice of law for thirty days, be…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. MaySupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  2. People v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  3. People v. BradleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  4. People v. CombsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cox's CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
  2. People v. EatonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API