Hawk v. Biggio
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
This appeal is from a judgment upholding the validity of a settlement agreement between appellant, Daniel R. Hawk, Sr., and appellees, Joseph A. Biggio, Jr. and Institutional Grocers, Inc. (Institutional). The issue is whether Hawk's attorney was authorized to negotiate the agreement. We hold he was and affirm.
The settlement agreement between the parties concerned two actions filed by Hawk against Biggio and Institutional and a cross claim by Hawk against Biggio and Institutional in an action by another party against him, Biggio and Institutional. Hawk and his attorney negotiated with the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Lipscomb v. TuckerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
- Senn v. JosephSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
3Cited by12 opinions
- King v. Travelers Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987
- Hill v. CherrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
- Fletcher v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1997
- Jones v. StedmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
- Warner v. Pony Express Courier Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.