Legal Opinion

Hawk v. Biggio

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 22, 1979No. 77-522PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This appeal is from a judgment upholding the validity of a settlement agreement between appellant, Daniel R. Hawk, Sr., and appellees, Joseph A. Biggio, Jr. and Institutional Grocers, Inc. (Institutional). The issue is whether Hawk's attorney was authorized to negotiate the agreement. We hold he was and affirm.

The settlement agreement between the parties concerned two actions filed by Hawk against Biggio and Institutional and a cross claim by Hawk against Biggio and Institutional in an action by another party against him, Biggio and Institutional. Hawk and his attorney negotiated with the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lipscomb v. TuckerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
  2. Senn v. JosephSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. King v. Travelers Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  2. Hill v. CherrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  3. Fletcher v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1997
  4. Jones v. StedmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  5. Warner v. Pony Express Courier Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API