Legal Opinion

People v. Duffus

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 22, 1995Published

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: There is no merit to defendant’s contention that the showup identification made 10 to 15 minutes after the incident and in its immediate vicinity was unduly suggestive (see, People v Duuvon, 77 NY2d 541, 545; People v Love, 57 NY2d 1023; People v Hendrick, 192 AD2d 1100, lv denied 82 NY2d 755). The challenge of defendant in his pro se supplemental brief to his prosecution by the Wayne County District Attorney was forfeited by defendant’s plea of guilty to a reduced charge (see, People v Prescott, 66 NY2d 216, 218, cert denied 475 US 1150; People v…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. DuuvonNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. People v. LoveNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. People v. PrescottNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. People v. HendrickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  5. People v. BumpAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API