Legal Opinion
Koshian v. Kirchner
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 8, 1988PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Viewing the proof in a light most favorable to sustain the judgment, we determine that there is credible proof in the record to sustain the findings and conclusions of the trial court (see, McCall v Town of Middlebury, 52 AD2d 736). A party relying upon another’s abandonment of an easement by grant must produce " 'clear and convincing proof of an intention to abandon it’ ” (Consolidated Rail Corp. v MASP Equip. Corp., 67 NY2d 35, 39-40, quoting Hennessy v Murdock, 137 NY 317, 326; Castle Assocs. v Schwartz, 63 AD2d 481, 487).…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Welsh v. . TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Castle Associates v. SchwartzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Gerbig v. ZumpanoNew York Court of Appeals · 1960
- Hennessy v. . MurdockNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Consolidated Rail Corp. v. MASP Equipment Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
3Cited by10 opinions
- Mueller v. BohannonNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
- Janoff v. DisickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Navin v. MosqueraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Cohen v. BanksJustice Court of Village of South Nyack · 1996
- Cowan v. CarnevaleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.