Legal Opinion

Cohen v. Banks

Justice Court of Village of South Nyack

Decided March 28, 1996PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Daniel Markewich, J.

This is the second small claims action between these parties, who are next door neighbors, concerning easements contained in their respective deeds. The previous lawsuit involved the parties’ septic tank easement, and resulted in a default judgment for $101.88 in favor of plaintiff for one half of the cost of repairs. This court’s opinion, primarily concerning issues of service requirements for notices of small claims, is reported as Cohen v Banks (160 Misc 2d 159 [Just Ct, Rockland County 1994]).

The current action arises out of the easement for the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Saratoga State Waters Corp. v. . PrattNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  2. Barnard v. GaumerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
  3. Lindhorst v. WrightCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1980
  4. Bina v. BinaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  5. Larabee v. BoothIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Quinlan v. StouffeAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  2. Green Harbour Homeowners' Ass'n v. G.H. Development & Construction, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. Estate Court, LLC v. SchnallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  4. Baker v. HinesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2013
  5. Quinlan v. StouffeAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API