State v. Towle
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.
Defendant seeks reversal of his conviction for burglary in the first degree, assigning as error the trial court’s determination that he was ineligible for court-appointed counsel. We reverse and remand for a new trial.
On May 8,1984, defendant completed an affidavit of his financial condition, stating that he owned a home valued at $85,000, a 1971 Ford which could be sold for $500, $350 in a savings account and $136 in cash. At arraignment on May 18, 1984, defendant was advised of his right to court-appointed counsel. He asked if he could reapply for counsel, because his financial condition…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. LingrenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- State v. GordonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. LingrenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- State v. FosterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
- State v. FreemanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
- Benally v. DenetclawNavajo Nation Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. SnyderCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991