Legal Opinion

Bakst v. Smokemist, Inc. (In re Gladstone)

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida.

Decided July 7, 2014No. Case No.: 10-32093-EPK; Adv. Proc. No.: 14-01343-EPKPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chapter 7

ORDER DETERMINING THAT THIS PROCEEDING IS A CORE MATTER IN ITS ENTIRETY AND THAT THIS COURT MAY ENTER FINAL ORDERS AND JUDGMENTS

Erik P. Kimball, Judge

This matter comes before the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(3) and the Defendants’ Motion Requesting That This Court Determine Whether This Proceeding Is A Core Proceeding Or Otherwise Subject To The Entry Of Final Orders Or Judgments By This Court, And Objection To The Entry Of Final Orders Or Judgments By This Court [ECF No. 53] filed by Smokemist, Inc., West Coast Investment Partners, LP, The Rio Trust, Gladstone Group…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Butner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Stern v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Granfinanciera, S.A. v. NordbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Executive Benefits Insurance Agency v. ArkisonSupreme Court of the United States · 2014

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Gierum v. Glick (In re Glick)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2017
  2. Harvey v. Dambowsky (In re Dambowsky)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2015
  3. Kapila v. SunTrust Mortgage, Inc. (In re Pearlman)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2014
  4. In re LosadaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 2016
  5. Yaquinto v. Ward (In re Ward)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 2016

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API