Legal Opinion

In Re Inquiry Concerning Lichtenstein

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided July 16, 1984No. 83SA490PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Pursuant, to Article VI, Section 23(3)(e) of the Colorado Constitution, the Commission on Judicial Discipline (Commission) certified the record of these proceedings to this court and recommended that a public reprimand be issued to District Judge Alvin D. Lichtenstein because he violated Canon 2A of the Colorado Code of Judicial Conduct (Code). Having reviewed the record of the proceedings as required by Article VI, Section 23(3)(f) of the Colorado Constitution, we conclude that the conduct of Judge Lichtenstein did not violate Canon 2A of the Code. We therefore reject the Commission’s…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Landmark Communications, Inc. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Gonzalez v. Commission on Judicial PerformanceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  3. In Re AlbanoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
  4. In the Matter of LasterMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  5. In the Matter Of: Inquiry Concerning a JudgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. ProffittColorado Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. People v. HowardColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. In the Matter of Hon. G. Todd BaughMontana Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Inquiry Concerning Complaint of Judicial Standards Commission v. BaughMontana Supreme Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API