Legal Opinion

In the Matter of Laster

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1979No. 60476, (Calendar No. 6)PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Per curiam

The Judicial Tenure Commission (hereinafter the Commission) has recommended that this Court, pursuant to its constitutional authority,1 publicly reprimand the Honorable Clar*455ence Laster, Detroit Recorder’s Court Judge. Pursuant to GCR 1963, 932.24, Judge Laster, the respondent, has petitioned this Court to reject the recommendation of the Commission claiming that:

1. A de novo review of the entire record does not support the Commission’s recommendation of a reprimand.

2. He acted in "good faith” at all times as a recorder’s court judge and "good faith” stands as an absolute defense to any…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Spruance v. Commission on Judicial QualificationsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. In the Matter of Del RioMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
  3. In re GreenbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  4. In the Matter of MikesellMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  5. In the Matter of BennettMichigan Supreme Court · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. In Re ChaissonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
  2. In Matter of Complaint Against SeraphimWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  3. In Re Inquiry Concerning BakerMississippi Supreme Court · 1988
  4. In Re LoydMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  5. In Re ServaasMichigan Supreme Court · 2009

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API