Westinghouse Electric Supply Co. v. Healy Corp.
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.
These two cases, which are not companion cases but are discussed together because they involve similar issues, concern the consequences of failure by appellants to comply seasonably with the requirements of the Massachusetts Rules of Appellate Procedure, concerning assembly of the record and the docketing of the appeal.
The first case is a contract action, in which the plaintiff (Westinghouse) on February 21, 1975, recovered a judgment for $17,102.50 against the defendant (Healy). Trial counsel for Healy filed its notice of appeal on February 27, 1975. Thereafter Healy engaged new counsel; and…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Rollins Environmental Services, Inc. v. Superior CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Pyramid Motor Freight Corp. v. IspassSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Schulte v. Director of the Division of Employment SecurityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Foreign Auto Import, Inc. v. Renault Northeast, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Gilmore v. GilmoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Markell v. Sidney B. Pfeifer Foundation, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
- Superintendent of Worcester State Hospital v. HagbergMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- Kunen v. First Agricultural National BankMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1978
- Vyskocil v. VyskocilMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- Georgantis v. Star Market CompaniesMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2000
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.