Snoqualmie Police Ass'n v. City of Snoqualmie
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.
¶1 On review of an arbitration award that is ambiguous on its face, a court should remand the award for clarification by the arbitrator.1 The arbitration award before us in this appeal is ambiguous on its face because it may be read in more than one reasonable way.2 Accordingly, the trial court should not have granted summary judgment to either party but should have remanded the matter to the arbitrator for clarification of the award. We reverse and remand with instructions.
¶2 The Snoqualmie Police Association (Association), the appellant in this case, represents Derek Kasel, a sergeant with…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- In re the Marriage of LittlefieldWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- In Re Marriage of LittlefieldWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Kitsap County v. Allstate InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1998
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Snoqualmie Police v. City of SnoqualmieCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- Dennis Sieracki, et ux v. Charles L. SheeleyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019