Legal Opinion

Richeson v. Wilson

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided April 26, 1948No. Record No. 3320PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEggleston, J.

This is a companion case to Mooers v. Wilson, 183 Va. 910, 33 S. E. (2d) 791, in which we affirmed a decree of the Circuit Court of Prince George county denying specific performance of an alleged contract, under the terms of which it was claimed that Norwood Wilson had agreed to sell to W. A. Mooers a valuable farm, known as “Maycox,” located in Prince George county, Virginia.

*538The present suit is an action for commissions brought by Frank S. Richeson and others, partners trading as H. T. Richeson & Company, against Wilson for services rendered in negotiating the alleged sale of the property by…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Massie v. FirmstoneSupreme Court of Virginia · 1922
  2. Smith v. TateSupreme Court of Virginia · 1886
  3. Low Moor Iron Co. v. JacksonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1915
  4. Mooers v. WilsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1945
  5. Virginia Hardwood Lumber Co. v. HughesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Duncan v. BarbourSupreme Court of Virginia · 1948
  2. Chittum v. PotterSupreme Court of Virginia · 1975
  3. Snider v. New River Insurance & Realty Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1948
  4. Washington v. GarrettSupreme Court of Virginia · 1949
  5. Edwards v. CraggSupreme Court of Virginia · 1948

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API