Legal Opinion

Lauermann v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 29, 2005No. E036833PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KING, Acting P. J.

In this case we are asked to determine the meaning of the term “duplicate original” as used in Probate Code section 6124. We hold that the term does not include a photocopy not personally executed by the testator and witnesses. Accordingly, the presumption that the testator destroyed his will with the intent to revoke it will apply at the trial of the matter.

Although the procedural history of the case is somewhat complicated, the significant facts may be briefly stated. Decedent, Wemer (or Warner) Lauermann, was survived by neither spouse nor issue. In 1987 he…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Korea Supply Co. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.California Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Halbert's Lumber, Inc. v. Lucky Stores, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1992
  4. Estate of JanesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Estate of Obernolte v. CaskeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gushwa v. HuntNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Audio Visual Services Group, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  3. Gushwa v. HuntNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. GUSHWA v. HuntNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Gushwa v. HuntNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API