Lauermann v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KING, Acting P. J.
In this case we are asked to determine the meaning of the term “duplicate original” as used in Probate Code section 6124. We hold that the term does not include a photocopy not personally executed by the testator and witnesses. Accordingly, the presumption that the testator destroyed his will with the intent to revoke it will apply at the trial of the matter.
Although the procedural history of the case is somewhat complicated, the significant facts may be briefly stated. Decedent, Wemer (or Warner) Lauermann, was survived by neither spouse nor issue. In 1987 he…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Korea Supply Co. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.California Supreme Court · 2003
- Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Halbert's Lumber, Inc. v. Lucky Stores, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1992
- Estate of JanesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Estate of Obernolte v. CaskeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
3Cited by5 opinions
- Gushwa v. HuntNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2008
- Audio Visual Services Group, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Gushwa v. HuntNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
- GUSHWA v. HuntNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
- Gushwa v. HuntNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2008