Legal Opinion
Aguirre Guerra v. Dematic Corp.
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided September 9, 2020No. 3:18-cv-00376Unknown
1Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 4 GUISELA AQUIRRE GUERRA, 3:18-CV-0376-LRH-CLB 5 Plaintiff, 6 v. ORDER 7 DEMATIC CORP, et al., 8 Defendants. 9 10 Before the court is Plaintiff Guisela Aguirre Guerra’s (“Guerra”) motion for leave to 11 file a second amended complaint (ECF No. 68). Defendant Dematic Corporation 12 (“Dematic”) opposed the motion,1 (ECF No. 70), and Plaintiff replied. (ECF No. 71). 13 Having thoroughly reviewed the records and papers, the Court denies Plaintiff’s motion for 14 leave to file a second amended complaint. 15 I. Factual Background and Procedural…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. StackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Steckman v. Hart Brewing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Carrico v. City and County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Giles v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Picus v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.