Legal Opinion

Hampton v. Pacific Investment Management Co.

District Court, C.D. California

Decided November 2, 2015No. Case No.: SACV 15-00131-CJC (JCGx)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

CORMAC J. CARNEY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

I. INTRODUCTION

This securities class action was brought against Pacific Investment Management Company, LLC (“PIMCO”), PIMCO Funds (the “Trust”), and seven of PIM-*1210CO’s employees (“the Trustees,” together with PIMCO and the Trust, “Defendants”) for breach of contract, breach of trust, breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and aiding and abetting the other causes of action. The causes of action all arise from the investment activity of a mutual fund managed by the Trust and advised by PIMCO…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. Gustafson v. Alloyd Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Jerry L. Branch, Valenna Branch, Colby Branch v. Dale L. Tunnell, Individually and as Special Agent of Bureau of Land Management, State of MontanaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. William Hampton v. Pacific Investment ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API