Legal Opinion

Soltis v. Tasir

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 13, 1984No. Appeal, No. 2492 C.D. 1982PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Baebiebi,

Appellants, residents in the immediate vicinity of property owned by the appellees, A. E. Tasir and Joyce Wahlah, appeal from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County which affirmed a decision of the Zoning Board of Adjustment (Board) of the City of Pittsburgh (City), granting the appellees’ request for a special exception1 to enlarge and rehabilitate their nonconforming structure. We reverse.

*553The appellees are owners of property located in an area of the city zoned as a “R-2 Two Family Residence District,” permitting one or two family dwellings.2 The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Marchese v. Norristown Borough Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  2. Smith v. Board of Zoning AppealsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Schaefer v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Repko v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Patenaude v. Middletown Zbr decision.doc, 2001-0545 (r.I.super. 2006)Superior Court of Rhode Island · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API