Legal Opinion

Cox v. Wall

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 6, 1962PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKirk, J.

The petitioners appeal from a decree of the Probate Court disallowing an instrument offered for probate as the will of Marion F. Orne, late of Somerville. The case was fully heard on the facts by the judge of probate without having been submitted to a jury. The judge upon request made a detailed report of material facts. He concluded that the instrument offered by the petitioners was procured by the exercise of undue influence by them over the deceased and that the deceased lacked testamentary capacity at the time the will was executed. The evidence is reported. With the exception of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Neill v. BrackettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  2. Goddard v. DupreeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
  3. Hoffman v. HoffmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
  4. Eddy v. EddyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  5. Mirick v. PhelpsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Henchey v. CoxMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
  2. Miles v. CaplesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
  3. Miles v. CaplesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
  4. Rizzo v. D'AmbrosioMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API