Legal Opinion

Abdenor v. Gould

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1922No. File No. 4885PublishedCited by 3 opinions

’Appeal from Circuit Court, Tripp County. Hon. Wiwjam WlUJAMSON, Judge. Action by Abraham A'bdenor, against William Gould, to recover damages for a personal assault. From a judgment for plaintiffs, and from an order denying a new trial, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtWhiting, J.

This cause is before us upon an appeal from the judgment and from, an order refusing a new trial. The sole question presented is whether the jurors or any of - them “were induced to assent” to their verdict “by a resort to the determination of chance.” Subdivision 2, § 2555, R. C. 1919, declares that to so reach a verdict is misconduct on the part of the jury such as will entitle the aggrieved party to a new trial, and also provides that such misconduct may be proved by the affidavit of any one of the jurors.

About a year after the trial, seven of the jurors made affidavits stating that:

“The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dixon v. PlunsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Long v. CollinsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Plank v. HeirigsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Fales v. KauppSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Platt v. City of Rapid CitySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API