Legal Opinion

Richmond v. Allstate Insurance

District Court, S.D. California

Decided April 25, 1995No. Civ. 95-196-B (CGA)PublishedCited by 196 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO REMAND AND RESETTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

BREWSTER, District Judge.

I. BACKGROUND

This action arises out of certain insurance policies for personal property issued by defendant Allstate Insurance Company. 1 Plaintiff Richmond brings this action on behalf of himself and all similarly situated persons seeking declaratory relief that defendants have violated California Insurance Code § 381.2. The proposed class consists of California residents who have been paid less than the full value stated in their Allstate insurance policies for total losses of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Frank D. Gaus v. Miles, Inc., an Indiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  2. Snyder v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Horton v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Neal v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Brandt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by196 opinions

  1. Conrad Associates v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1998
  2. Simmons v. PCR TECHNOLOGYDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2002
  3. Surber v. Reliance National Indemnity Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2000
  4. Burk v. Medical Savings InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2004
  5. Rippee v. Boston Market Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 2005

191 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API