United States v. Hubbard
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TROTT, Circuit Judge:
OVERVIEW
Michael Hubbard and James Lyon were convicted of conspiracy to commit mail fraud related to an elaborate scheme of odometer tampering. They appeal the district court’s denial of their Motion for Judgment of Acquittal, arguing (1) that there was insufficient evidence to support a charge of conspiracy, (2) that there was no “mailing” to bring their conduct within the mail fraud statute, (3) that there was no showing of specific intent to defraud by use of the mails, and (4) that the district court’s partial judgment of acquittal on the charge of conspiracy to engage…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Pereira v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Schmuck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. FeolaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. MazeSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- United States v. BlitzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Raohl HurshCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. GreenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gulmohamed Abdulkader SERANG, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Mary Ann GriceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.