Legal Opinion
Miami Nation of Indians v. Babbitt
District Court, N.D. Indiana
Decided March 29, 1999No. 3:92-CV-586RMPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MILLER, District Judge.
The plaintiffs (the “Miamis”) have filed a motion to supplement the administrative i;ecord through expert testimony. The defendants — collectively called the Government in this memorandum — oppose the motion. For the following reasons, the court denies the Miamis’ motion for discovery and to supplement the administrative record through expert testimony.
In 1980, the Miamis filed a petition for federal acknowledgment as an Indian tribe pursuant to 25 C.F.R. Part 83 (1978).1 *923The Assistant Secretary of the Interior, in both his proposed finding and final…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Florida Power & Light Co. v. LorionSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Don Olenhouse v. Commodity Credit CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Miami Nation of Indians of Indiana v. BabbittDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2000