Legal Opinion

Osborn v. Moasco, Inc.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 2, 1937No. 27663PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHurst, J.

This is an appeal from an order sustaining a motion for judgment on the pletedings in favor of one of the defendants, Harry Robbins. The following is a brief abstract of the pleadings:

The action was commenced by the petition of Mrs. L. E. Osborn, doing business as the Oilton Torpedo Company, seeking to recover from Moasco, Inc., for materials furnished and labor performed in the shooting of a well loc'ated on a lease owned by Moasco, Inc., and to foreclose a laborer’s lien upon the easing, tubing, rods, tanks, rig, and other machinery and equipment located thereon. Plaintiff afterwards filed…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. White v. A. C. Houston Lbr. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  2. McAnally v. CochranSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Brewer v. Oil Well Supply Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  4. Ince Nursery Co. v. SamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  5. Garber & Pulse, Inc. v. GloydSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kendall v. SharpSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  2. Little v. Employer's Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API